Analytical Study of Generation, Composition, And Potential For Waste Recycling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55018/janh.v6i1.150Keywords:
Waste, Generation, Composition, Recycling PotentialAbstract
Background: Waste is still a serious problem globally. Accumulated and poorly managed waste becomes a reservoir for disease vector animals in the environment. Sources of waste include home activities, offices, schools, campuses, industry, and other public places
Methods: This research was conducted using a survey, which took samples from several research locations and used observation sheets as a data collection tool. In this research, measurements and recording were carried out to calculate the generation and composition of waste in the campus environment.
Results: The research results describe the generation and composition of waste at one of the survey locations, Unja Sports Hall. The survey, conducted for five days, yielded results that included the average waste generation per day being 2.5 L and most food waste. The average dry waste generation is 5.3827 L consisting of 6.84% paper, 73.44% plastic, 2.15% badminton cocks and 17.58% styrofoam. The waste with the most significant recycling potential is dry, namely 76%, including 8.87% paper, 66.27% plastic, and 0.41% cans. Apart from that, wet waste also has the potential to be recycled as compost, namely 24.58%, consisting of 17.08% food waste and 7.77% yard waste. Based on organic and inorganic waste, organic waste has a recycling potential of 24.58%, and inorganic waste has a recycling potential of 66.27%.
Conclusion: Organic waste that can be recycled consists of food and yard waste, and inorganic waste consists of plastic, paper, and cans. This waste recycling process will produce a craft that has selling value. Before carrying out the recycling process, a waste sorting process is carried out according to specific criteria.
Downloads
References
Ardiati, A. S., & Gati, A. A. (2021). Analysis of Waste Management at UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta. Scientific Journal of the Earth Environment, 3(1), 30–44.
BPS Jambi City. (2022). Jambi City in 2022 Figures.
Damanhuri, E. (2011). Waste Management. Bandung Institute of Technology.
Dewanti, M., Purnomo, E. P., & Salsabila, L. (2020). Analysis of the effectiveness of waste banks as an alternative to waste management in achieving a smart city in Kulon Progo Regency. Journal of Public Administration, 5(1), 21–29.
Faisya, A. F., & Ainy, A. (2014). Analysis of the Implementation of Waste Management at Unsri Inderalaya Campus in 2013. Journal of Public Health Sciences, 5(2).
Jambi City Government. (2020). Jambi City Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2020 concerning Waste Management. Jambi City Government.
President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Law Number 18 of 2008 concerning Waste Management.
SIPSN of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2022a). Waste Composition Based on Jambi City Waste Sources 2022. Directorate General of Waste, Waste and B3 Management, and Directorate of Waste Management, Ministry of Environment and Forestry. https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/public/data/sumber
SIPSN of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2022b). Jambi City Waste Generation 2022. Directorate General of Waste, Waste and B3 Management, Ministry of Environment and Forestry. https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/public/data/komposisi
SIPSN of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2022c). National Waste Generation. Directorate General of Waste, Waste and B3 Management, Ministry of Environment and Forestry. https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/public/data/timbulan
Indonesian National Standards. (2002). SNI 19-2454-2002: Operational engineering procedures for urban waste management. National Standardization Agency.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Oka Lesmana S, Fajrina Hidayati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.














