Factors Influencing Patient Perception of Clinical Laboratory Services: A Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55018/janh.v8i1.456Keywords:
hospitals, clinical laboratory services, patient perception, patient satisfaction, service qualityAbstract
Background: Hospital clinical laboratories are essential for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and clinical decision-making, and increasingly contribute to hospital revenue. However, in contrast to high-income settings where laboratory service quality has been more extensively studied, there is still limited empirical evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Indonesia, on how structural and process-related aspects of private hospital clinical laboratory services shape patient perceptions. This study aimed to analyze factors associated with patient perceptions of clinical laboratory services.
Methods: This quantitative cross-sectional study. A total of 114 consecutively recruited patients completed the Clinical Laboratory Service Perception Questionnaire (CLSPQ), a 22-item validated instrument covering education level, physical environment (laboratory room, cleanliness of rooms and toilets, waiting area comfort), service processes (waiting time, availability of tests, clarity of information), and overall perception of laboratory services. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression to identify independent predictors of positive patient perceptions (p < 0.05).
Results: In multivariable analysis, higher education level, bright and hygienic laboratory rooms, comfortable and clean waiting areas, clear information about laboratory services, very clean laboratory rooms, clean and odorless toilets, shorter waiting times, and availability of all required laboratory tests were independently associated with positive patient perceptions of clinical laboratory services (all p < 0.001). Laboratory cleanliness showed the strongest association with positive perceptions, followed by toilet cleanliness and shorter waiting times.
Conclusion: Physical environmental conditions and key service delivery processes are major determinants of how patients perceive clinical laboratory services in this LMIC private hospital. Prioritizing low-cost improvements in cleanliness, waiting room comfort, queue management, and clarity of information within continuous quality improvement programmes may substantially enhance patient satisfaction and strengthen the professional image of hospital laboratories in similar resource-limited settings.
Downloads
References
Abebe, D. D., Temesgen, M. M., & Abozin, A. T. (2023). Clinicians’ satisfaction with laboratory services and associated factors at public health facilities in Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 475. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09429-0
Basri, S. (2021). Metode Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Parasuraman Zeithaml Berry. EGC.
Cai, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Wang, C., & Jiang, Y. (2025). A cross-sectional study on the relationship between length of stay and patient satisfaction based on the SERVQUAL model. Scientific Reports, 15, 5605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90176-z
Deger, M. S., Yildiz, H., & Kaya, E. (2024). Service quality and related factors in primary health care: A cross-sectional study. Healthcare, 12(10), 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12100965
Fatmawati, N., & Yuliana, D. (2021). Analysis of patient perception and satisfaction on laboratory services at district hospital. International Journal of Public Health Science, 10(4), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v10i4.20851
Hosseinzadeh, M., Pouladzadeh, M., & Eskandari, A. (2024). Assessment of healthcare service quality and patient satisfaction using the SERVQUAL questionnaire. Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease & Care, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-146329
Hossen, M. P., Islam, A. N. M. S., & Shohid, S. (2023). Patients’ satisfaction towards laboratory services at secondary level hospitals. International Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 10(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10575770
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Levana, V., Sari, R., & Putra, A. (2022). Antecedents of patient satisfaction in private clinical laboratories: A study in Indonesia. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9809
Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Hussain, A., Asif, M., & Shah, S. I. A. (2019). Patient satisfaction with health care services: An application of physician’s behavior as a moderator. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183318
Pamuji, D. A. (2018). Gap Quality Analysis of Clinical Laboratory Services Against Patient Satisfaction in Purwokerto Islamic Hospital. https://consensus.app/papers/gap-quality-analysis-of-clinical-laboratory-services-pamuji/094f79adeab85178a434baf873ba5b57/
Rahmatia, S., Basri, M., Ismail, I., Adi, S., Nasrullah, N., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Service quality in hospital inpatient care: SERVQUAL model approach. Health SA Gesondheid, 30. https://doi.org/10.4102/HSAG.v30i0.3055
Santoso, E. (2018). A Gap Analysis On The Clinical Laboratory Quality Service On Patient Satisfaction In RSUP dr. Soeradji Tirtonegoro. https://consensus.app/papers/a-gap-analysis-on-the-clinical-laboratory-quality-service-santoso/5e0b905cb2b750a48bd1a04091af5c36/
Shie, A. J., Lin, C. H., & Gomez, R. (2022). Exploring the relationship between hospital service quality, service encounter, trust, and loyalty. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.876266
Singh, A., Senkanungo, D., Jagadeesha, M., Ahire, N., & DurgaRao, P. V. (2021). Predicting patient satisfaction from inpatient hospital laboratory services with logistic regression approach. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Public Health, 23. https://doi.org/10.36295/ASRO.2020.2323152
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. In Alfabeta Bandung.
Thanh, N. D., Pham, L., & Nguyen, T. H. (2022). Patient satisfaction with healthcare service quality: Validity, reliability, and associated factors. International Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1605055
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
WHO. (2023). WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: seventy-sixth report. World Health Organization.
Zhang, X., Zhang, X., & Huang, J. (2022). Exploring determinants of patient satisfaction with hospital laboratory services: A cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08691-y
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Afif Wahyudi Hidayat, Lyliana Endang Setianingsih, Emmelia Kristina Hutagaol

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.














