Comparative Performance of TIMI and GRACE Scores for Predicting Mortality and MACE in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Authors

  • Fajar Prasetyo Winoto Master of Nursing Study Program Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Brawijaya, East Java, Indonesia.
  • Titin Andri Wihastuti Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Brawijaya, East Java, Indonesia.
  • Laily Yuliatun Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Brawijaya, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55018/janh.v8i2.695

Keywords:

acute coronary syndrome, GRACE, TIMI, mortality, MACE, scoping review

Abstract

Background: TIMI and GRACE scores are widely used for prognostic risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), yet comparative evidence across ACS subtypes, settings, follow-up periods, and outcomes remains heterogeneous. This scoping review mapped evidence comparing TIMI and GRACE scores for predicting mortality and MACE in patients with ACS or suspected ACS.

Methods: This scooping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the PCC framework, and the Arksey and O’Malley approach. Searches were conducted in ProQuest, Scopus, and CINAHL using Boolean search terms related to TIMI, GRACE, ACS, mortality, and MACE. Eligible studies were empirical quantitative studies comparing TIMI and GRACE for predicting mortality and MACE in adults with ACS. Records were screened, full texts were assessed, data were recorded using a standardized form, and findings were synthesized narratively based on outcomes and clinical settings.

Results: A total of 187 records were identified, 45 duplicates were removed, 142 records were screened, 44 full-text reports were assessed, and 12 studies were included. Studies were published between 2022 and 2025 and included at least 12,039 participants from China, Lithuania, India, Turkey, Spain, Pakistan, and Iran. For mortality, GRACE more consistently demonstrated stronger discrimination than TIMI, particularly in NSTEMI, broader AMI cohorts, and STEMI patients undergoing reperfusion or PCI. For MACE, findings were more heterogeneous; GRACE generally performed better in confirmed NSTE-ACS and STEMI PCI cohorts, whereas TIMI showed comparable or sometimes higher discrimination than GRACE in undifferentiated emergency chest pain populations.

Conclusion: The comparative performance of TIMI and GRACE depends on ACS phenotype, clinical context, and outcome definition. GRACE appears more robust for mortality prediction, while TIMI retains practical value as a simple bedside tool, especially in rapid triage contexts. Future studies should standardize MACE definitions, reporting metrics, and subgroup analyses across ACS populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldujeli, A., Haq, A., Hamadeh, A., Stalmokaite, A., & Maciulevicius, L. (2022). A comparison of crisk scores ’ long-term predictive abilities for patients diagnosed with ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent early percutaneous coronary intervention. 56(1), 56–64.

Alexander, L., Mcinerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). scoping reviews. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

Bakhsh, K., Pervez, T., Ashraf, M. N., Rizwan, M. H., & Chaudhary, N. (2023). Comparison of Various Clinical Risk Assessment Tools in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Presenting in Emergency Department with Undifferentiated Cardiac Chest Pain. 73(1), 195–199.

Campbell, F., Tricco, A. C., Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Saran, A., Sutton, A., White, H., & Khalil, H. (2023). Mapping reviews , scoping reviews , and evidence and gap maps ( EGMs ): the same but different — the “ Big Picture ” review family. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5

Dinesh, M. V., Ramesh, A. C., & Rangaswamy, K. M. M. (2022). A prospective risk stratification and validation of HEART , GRACE and TIMI scores for chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department. 8(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2022.16

Isfahani, M. N., Mohseni, H., & Nasrabadi, E. N. (2025). Improving chest pain risk assessment : validation of HEART , TIMI , GRACE , EDACS- ADP , and HET for MACE prediction in the emergency department. 4.

Kasim, S., Nur, P., Amir, F., Id, S. M., Aziz, F., Ahmad, A. W., Ibrahim, K. S., Hanis, M., Hamidi, M., Ezman, R., Shariff, R., Yean, A., Fong, Y., & Song, C. (2024). Data analytics approach for short- and long- term mortality prediction following acute non- ST-elevation myocardial infarction ( NSTEMI ) and Unstable Angina ( UA ) in Asians. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298036

Kumar, R., Safdar, U., Yaqoob, N., Khan, S. F., Matani, K., Khan, N., Jalil, B., Yousufzai, E., Shahid, M. O., Khan, S., Naeem, S., Bhagia, K., Ahmed, M., Tunio, A. F., Mughal, K. A., Hyder, A., Farooq, F., Sial, J. A., Saghir, T., & Karim, M. (2025). Assessment of the prognostic performance of TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC and GRACE scores for short-Term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing emergent percutaneous revascularisation: A prospective observational study. BMJ Open, 15(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091028

Muste, S. R., Babes, E. E., Bustea, C., Dobjanschi, L., Muste, F. A., & Zaha, D. C. (2026). Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction : A Heterogeneous Syndrome with Evolving Management — A Narrative Review. 1–34.

Nurma, S., & Hadie, H. (2024). ABC of a Scoping Review : A Simplified JBI Scoping Review Guideline. 16(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2024.16.2.14

Pollock, D., Evans, C., Menghao, R., Alexander, L., Pieper, D., Moraes, D., Peters, M. D. J., Tricco, A. C., Khalil, H., Godfrey, C. M., Saran, A., Campbell, F., & Munn, Z. (2024). ‘“ How-to ”’: scoping review ? 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111572

San, I. N., Arispe, R., Sol, J., Gil, A. C., & Trujillano, J. (2023). Comparison of heart , grace and TIMI scores to predict major adverse cardiac events from chest pain in a Spanish health care region European Society of Cardiology. Scientific Reports, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44214-3

SR, A., Lakshmaiah, Y., DGSR, K. M., NT, M. M., KJ, D. P., K, R., & Y, N. R. (2025). A Comparison of TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) and GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Scores, Myocardial Blush Grade, and Shock Index-Based Indices for Predicting Outcomes in STEMI Patients Undergoing Reperfusion. Cureus, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84938

Szabo, D., Szabo, A., Magyar, L., Banhegyi, G., Kugler, S., Pinter, A., Juhasz, V., Ruppert, M., Olah, A., Ruzsa, Z., Edes, I. F., Szekely, A., Becker, D., Merkely, B., & Hizoh, I. (2022). Admission lactate level and the GRACE 2 . 0 score are independent and additive predictors of 30-day mortality of STEMI patients treated with primary PCI — Results of a real-world registry. Idi, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277785

Task, A., Members, F., Byrne, R. A., Ireland, C., Rossello, X., Coughlan, J. J., Ireland, T. F. C., Barbato, E., Berry, C., Kingdom, U., Chieffo, A., Claeys, M. J., Dan, G., Dweck, M. R., Galbraith, M., Kingdom, U., France, M. G., Jüni, P., Lorusso, R., … United, J. (2023). 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes Developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology ( ESC ) ( United Kingdom ), ( United Kingdom ),. 3720–3826. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191

Taub, P. R. (2025). 2025 ACC / AHA / ACEP / NAEMSP / SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. 85(22), 2135–2237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.009

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., Brien, K. K. O., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Ma, Q., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Hons, B. A., Wilson, M. G., & Garritty, C. (2018). R ESEARCH AND R EPORTING M ETHODS PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews ( PRISMA-ScR ): Checklist and Explanation. August 2016. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Tufan, Ç., & Faysal, S. (2023). Evaluation of Intermountain Risk Score for Short- and Long-Term Mortality in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients. 74(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197221105753

Varughese, V. J., Pollock, J., Patel, P., Richardson, C., Joseph, C., & Vacca, D. (2025). Outcomes of NSTEMI Admissions and Significance of TIMI Scores : A Nationwide Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.

Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Qi, D., Wang, X., Zhu, Z., & Yang, W. (2024). Age shock index and age-modified shock index are valuable bedside prognostic tools for postdischarge mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. 56(1), 1–15.

Wita, W., Shariefuddin, A., Pramudyo, M., & Martha, J. W. (2024). Shock index creatinine : a new predictor of mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients. 4, 1–8.

Wontor, R., Ołpińska, B., Rudnicka, M. Ł., Wyderka, R., Dudek, K., Grudzień, K. Ł., & Jaroch, J. (2024). Addition of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator to the classic Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score improves its prognostic value in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16862

Xin, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, C., & Wang, Q. (2025). Predictive value of novel inflammatory markers combined with GRACE score hospital outcome in patients with for in- ­ segment elevation myocardial infarction : a retrospective observational study. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096621

Yalcin Ocak, N., Yesilaras, M., Kilicaslan, B., Eyler, Y., Mutlu, İ., & Kutlu, M. (2023). Comparing TIMI, HEART, and GRACE Risk Scores to Predict Angiographic Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Emergency Department Patients with NSTEACS. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 38(6), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X23006490

Yang, B., Bai, L., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhao, C., Huang, B., & Chen, M. (2022). The Value of Different Short-Term Risk Scoring Models in Predicting Long-Term Death of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Yanqiao, L., Shen, L., Yutong, M., Linghong, S., & Ben, H. (2022). Comparison of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in the prediction of in ‑ hospital and long ‑ term outcomes among East Asian non ‑ ST ‑ elevation myocardial infarction patients. 1–10.

Yildirim, M., Reich, C., Salbach, C., Biener, M., Mueller, M., Sörensen, N. A., Haller, P. M., Blankenberg, S., Neumann, J. T., Twerenbold, R., Frey, N., & Giannitsis, E. (2025). Identification of patients with suspected NSTE ‑ ACS in the observe zone : evaluating GRACE 1 . 0 score and a biomarker panel for risk stratification and management optimization European Society of Cardiology Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 114(6), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02642-3

Zheng, J., Li, J., Li, T., Hu, F., & Cheng, D. (2025). Development and validation of an in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events risk model for young patients with acute coronary syndrome : a retrospective cohort study. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19513

Downloads

Published

2026-07-12

How to Cite

Winoto, F. P. ., Wihastuti, T. A. ., & Yuliatun, L. . (2026). Comparative Performance of TIMI and GRACE Scores for Predicting Mortality and MACE in Acute Coronary Syndrome. Journal of Applied Nursing and Health, 8(2), 1623–1637. https://doi.org/10.55018/janh.v8i2.695